Overview of Union Territories in India
- Definition and Classification of Territories in India:
- India’s territory includes:
- States – part of the federal system with power-sharing between the states and the central government.
- Union Territories (UTs) – directly controlled by the Central Government; known as “centrally administered territories.”
- Acquired Territories – can be added by the Indian government if acquired in the future.
- India’s territory includes:
- Creation and Evolution of Union Territories:
- During British rule, specific areas were designated as ‘scheduled districts,’ later evolving into ‘chief commissioners’ provinces.
- Post-independence, the 7th Constitutional Amendment and the States Reorganization Act of 1956 established Union Territories.
- States Originally Union Territories: Some states (e.g., Himachal Pradesh, Manipur, Mizoram) transitioned from union territories to full states.
- List of Current Union Territories (with the year of creation):
- Andaman and Nicobar Islands (1956)
- Delhi (1956) – re-designated as the National Capital Territory in 1992
- Lakshadweep (1956)
- Puducherry (1962) – previously known as Pondicherry
- Chandigarh (1966)
- Jammu and Kashmir (2019) – with its own legislature
- Ladakh (2019) – without a legislature
- Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu (merged in 2020)
Reasons for Creation of Union Territories
- Political and Administrative Considerations:
- E.g., Delhi and Chandigarh are strategically significant for central governance.
- Cultural Distinctiveness:
- E.g., Puducherry and Dadra and Nagar Haveli showcase unique cultural histories influenced by French and Portuguese rule.
- Strategic Importance:
- E.g., Andaman and Nicobar Islands, and Lakshadweep are located at key maritime positions.
- Special Treatment for Tribal or Backward Regions:
- Some former Union Territories, such as Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh, were initially set up to address local cultural and developmental needs.
Administration of Union Territories
- Governed by Articles 239 to 241 of the Indian Constitution.
- Each UT has an administrator, usually appointed by the President of India.
- The designation of this administrator varies (Lieutenant Governor, Chief Commissioner, or Administrator).
- Administrators act as agents of the President and are not the same as state governors.
Specific Provisions for Selected Union Territories
- Delhi:
- Special status under the 69th Constitutional Amendment.
- Legislative Assembly with limited powers; cannot legislate on matters like police, public order, and land.
- Has a Council of Ministers led by a Chief Minister.
- Jammu and Kashmir:
- Became a UT in 2019 with a separate legislature due to security considerations and regional demands.
- Ladakh was carved out as a UT without a legislature for its sparse population and strategic location.
- Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu:
- Merged into one UT in 2020 for administrative efficiency, shared culture, and history.
- Reduced redundancy and resource expenditure by combining the administration.
Administrative Setup and Powers
- Legislative Power: Parliament holds the authority to legislate on any subject, including those typically reserved for state legislatures.
- However, UTs like Delhi, Puducherry, and Jammu and Kashmir, with their legislatures, also have some law-making powers within specified domains.
- Judicial System:
- UTs are either placed under the jurisdiction of nearby state High Courts (e.g., Chandigarh under Punjab and Haryana High Court).
- Delhi has its own High Court since 1966.
Comparison of Union Territories with States
| Aspect | States | Union Territories |
|---|---|---|
| Governance Structure | Federal with state autonomy | Unitary under central control |
| Legislative Powers | Limited intervention by Parliament | Parliament can legislate on any subject |
| Administrative Uniformity | Consistent setup across states | Varies by UT |
| Judicial System | Generally own high courts | Often under state high courts, except Delhi |
Key Takeaways
- Union Territories offer a flexible governance model, allowing direct central oversight and specialized attention based on the unique cultural, strategic, or administrative needs of each region.
- Parliamentary Authority: Union Territories allow Parliament a direct role in law-making across various subjects, with some exceptions for UTs with legislative assemblies.
- Administrative Efficiency: Mergers, like that of Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu, reflect ongoing efforts to streamline governance and minimize duplication.
Special Administrative Provisions for Union Territories
- Role of the President and Administrator:
- President’s Authority: The President of India has significant authority over UTs, including the power to appoint administrators who function as agents of the President, not as autonomous heads like state governors.
- Designation Variability: Administrators’ titles vary (Lieutenant Governor, Administrator, or Chief Commissioner) based on the specific requirements and structure of each UT.
- Legislative Assemblies in Certain UTs:
- Delhi, Puducherry, Jammu & Kashmir have legislative assemblies, providing limited self-governance.
- Powers of Legislative Assemblies:
- Delhi can legislate on matters of the State and Concurrent Lists, excluding critical areas such as public order, police, and land.
- Puducherry has a legislative assembly that legislates on the State List and Concurrent List.
- Jammu & Kashmir was granted a legislative assembly in 2019, with similar powers as Delhi, except for control over police and public order.
- Legislative Limitations: Even with these assemblies, the central government retains supreme authority, and laws made by Parliament override UT legislative assembly laws.
- Regulatory Power of the President:
- For UTs without legislative assemblies (like Andaman & Nicobar Islands, Ladakh, and Lakshadweep), the President has the power to issue regulations with the same force as parliamentary laws.
- Regulation Creation: The President can create, amend, or repeal laws directly applicable to these UTs, providing a streamlined approach to governance when local legislation is unavailable.
Judicial Structure of Union Territories
- High Court Jurisdiction:
- Delhi has its own High Court (established in 1966), highlighting its unique status among UTs.
- Other UTs are under the jurisdiction of nearby High Courts:
- Chandigarh under Punjab and Haryana High Court
- Andaman and Nicobar Islands under Calcutta High Court
- Lakshadweep under Kerala High Court
- Puducherry under Madras High Court
- Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu under Bombay High Court
- Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh share the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh.
Special Status of Delhi
- The 69th Constitutional Amendment Act (1991) provided Delhi a unique status, renaming it the National Capital Territory (NCT) and establishing:
- A 70-member Legislative Assembly elected by the people, which can legislate on most State and Concurrent List matters (except police, public order, and land).
- Council of Ministers led by a Chief Minister, appointed by the President, who advises the Lieutenant Governor on certain matters.
- Lieutenant Governor’s Discretion: In case of disagreements with the Council of Ministers, the Lieutenant Governor can escalate issues to the President.
Advisory Committees of Union Territories
- Home Minister’s Advisory Committee (HMAC):
- Set up for UTs without legislative assemblies, including Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Chandigarh, Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu, Lakshadweep, and Ladakh.
- Composition: Led by the Union Home Minister, with Members of Parliament and elected members from local bodies like district panchayats and municipal councils.
- Purpose: To address and advise on social and economic development in these regions, promoting the welfare of local communities.
- Administrator’s Advisory Committee (AAC):
- Chaired by the Administrator of each UT.
- Focused on local governance issues, ensuring local representation in administrative decision-making for efficient and responsive governance.
Key Articles Related to Union Territories in the Constitution
- Article 239: Details the administration of Union Territories.
- Article 239AA: Provides special provisions for the administration of Delhi.
- Article 239A: Allows the creation of legislative bodies and a Council of Ministers for certain UTs.
- Article 241: Discusses the establishment of High Courts for UTs or jurisdiction under nearby state High Courts.
Comparison of Union Territories and States – Summary Table
| Aspect | States | Union Territories |
|---|---|---|
| Relationship with Centre | Federal structure with shared power | Unitary structure under direct central administration |
| Legislative Authority | Limited to extraordinary circumstances | Parliament has authority over all subjects |
| Autonomy | High level of autonomy | Limited autonomy, varies by UT |
| Executive Head | Governor appointed by the President | Administrator or Lieutenant Governor |
| Uniformity in Setup | Consistent across all states | Varies by each Union Territory |
| Judicial Setup | Own High Courts or share jurisdiction with others | Usually under nearby state High Courts, except Delhi |